Over 59196
politifake

Doublethink Politics


gun mongering -




distinction without a differnce -




profiling and bigotry -


TAGS: bernadino conservaphobia doublethink hypocrisy nra
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - December 12, 2015, 7:34 pm
I noticed that error myself. I usually catch that error better when I make it.
Cyberhagen - December 12, 2015, 12:48 pm
*Their (ideological opponents) -just saying.


Nohamotyo -




liberal tolerance dogma -




‘Civil Rights Martyr’ -




apeal to authority -


TAGS: doublethink propaganda eric the red
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - June 7, 2015, 1:48 pm
No, and actual misspelling.
RonaldReagan - June 4, 2015, 6:58 pm
Apeal? Another intentional misspelling?


When Diversity Becomes a Problem -




Department of State -




Jeremiah True -


TAGS: doublethink tolerance zombie stats
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - March 23, 2015, 12:46 am
http://www.politifake.org/bad-apples-purple-people-beaters-politics-61824.html I never said they where all bad, or even most. But one side tends to get a pass on this more than the other.
DebtToAmerica - March 22, 2015, 7:45 pm
"the existence of bigoted idiots who call themselves liberals means that all liberals are bad!" "what? a few bad eggs in the republican party doesnt make all conservatives bad!"


just set the record -




Dick-Durbin -




Iran deal -




Religious freedom restoration act -


TAGS: acceptable target propaganda doublethink rule12
Rating: 3.5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - April 5, 2015, 12:10 pm
Well, unless the government was involved in that firing them this law would not apply.
mittromney - April 5, 2015, 12:09 pm
/Answer - Since you became a member of the church? / sorry. you have to admit, you opened yourself up for that one
OTC - April 5, 2015, 9:08 am
Since when did homose.xuality become a religion?
Oldsod - April 5, 2015, 6:30 am
I've known two women, working for different companies, who have lost their jobs for nothing more than refusing to remove a small gold cross from their lapel. Add in the Hobby Lobby case...nothing to do with homo***uality.
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:30 pm
Attacking me will not make, "become so outrageous?" go away. The facts disagree with you.
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:29 pm
Nope, it didn't allow for that before amendment. And as my poster points out the prothera of such laws in the USA your interpretation very far fetched and that is not my fault.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:20 pm
Only because lawmakers quickly amended the law and added protections for g**s and les*****, bowing to public pressure. I take your poster as a critique of that decision. If that wasn't your intention, you should've made that more clear in your poster
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:16 pm
Smarty pants gibberish. "Outragious" isn't a word. It's not the computer's fault. I don't blame my hammer for when I smash my thumb. I curse like a sailor and blame God. Then I wise up.
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:15 pm
Wow, you majorly missed what I said. The law you are complaining about does not allow for the behavior that you say it does. In fact neither does.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:13 pm
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. Who was President then?
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:13 pm
Your Proof by a**ertion doesn't make, "become so outrageous?" go away.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:12 pm
Spin
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:11 pm
You mean the law crafted after the Clinton law that I was talking about? Because it still does not allow for what you are complaining about.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:09 pm
Not discussing the Clinton law. You should have made that more clear in your poster, it would appear you are using this other law to make a sly critique over the "outrage" against the Indiana Law. I doubt it is a coincidence.
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:08 pm
Nope, provable facts.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:05 pm
Excuses
calron - April 4, 2015, 11:02 pm
And still the law doesn't allow that. So what is your point here.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 11:01 pm
Businesses don't have a right to refuse employment to someone because they claim it's an imposition on their religious value to employ a lesbian. My sister is a lesbian. Watch what you say.
calron - April 4, 2015, 10:58 pm
Well as thus law doesn't, what would your point be?
calron - April 4, 2015, 10:58 pm
Nope, on the main the where it included the text of the politifake, presumably so it can be searched, it lists the word corrected. It's fact, not bogymen. It is likely because of the way I corrected the error.
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 10:56 pm
A law that gives businesses a right to refuse employment to a lesbian for religious reasons is patently dishonest. Discrimination was never a Christian value. It's a value of close minded jerks hijacking religion for hateful purposes
RonaldReagan - April 4, 2015, 10:52 pm
You're blaming your bad spelling on the bogeyman again
calron - April 4, 2015, 10:27 pm
I notice the spelling error did not make it into the description at the bottom.


housing placement by race -




Yemen -




policy backfire -




Guilt Tax -




the iran deal -




political fundamentalism -




PREV PAGE